Correction, DN — Corbett wields the chainsaw


How to send the wrong message regarding Corbett's budget cuts

Here’s Josh Cornfield of the Philadelphia Daily News following up on reaction to the newspaper’s cheesy, Photoshopped front page photo on March 31:

The Philadelphia School District apparently loved the Daily News’ cover yesterday as much as district parents and students will love the massive cuts coming their way. From its Twitter account, @PhillyEducation, the district spent hours blasting the Daily News for the image of Superintendent Arlene Ackerman holding a chainsaw, claiming that the photo illustration and “Chainsaw Massacre” headline promoted violence…

Apparently, it’s more fun to tweet about pretend links between satirical images and school violence than about the 163 school police officers the district threatened to fire on Wednesday. Or the threat to eliminate instrumental music, summer school, sports, teachers, counselors – or more than $600 million in services… The district didn’t stop spending taxpayer resources on excoriating the Daily News there, however. It went a step further, sending two paid staffers to interview Will Jordan, an associate professor of urban education at Temple University, about the cover image…

A paid staffer also edited the video and posted it to the district’s YouTube channel. All of those manpower hours had to be enough to pay for at least a couple of football helmets – you know, to keep students safe from the impending onslaught of chainsaw-wielding high-school students…

Maybe you mean well, Josh, but your newspaper’s approach to this story is a good example of the mainstream media’s uncanny knack for focusing on the wrong villains. Ackerman is a lousy superintendent, maybe even a petty tyrant. But she’s not the architect of the so-called austerity measures designed to kill public schools, cripple unions and bring down wages. It’s PA Gov. Tom Corbett, the crooked old white guy, who should be wielding the chainsaw on your cover.

Sure, the school district people are tone-deaf to satire, and they wasted time and money attacking the DN. But this was only after the DN wasted time and money placing its primary focus on Ackerman instead of Corbett and the Republican legislature — the people dead-set on privatizing our schools.

It’s not enough for you guys to explain the story on an inside page — Oh, by the way, Ackerman would rather not be slashing programs, but she will have no choice thanks to Corbett. You should be hitting people over the head with this fact, so that they’re conscious of who the enemy is and how they can fight back.

Don’t worry, I get it — the DN is a tabloid and you want to piss people off, it’s good for sales. But why deflect anger and blame from Corbett by misrepresenting Ackerman’s role? Why turn one Philly faction against another instead of trying to unite Philadelphians against the corporate-owned skunk in Harrisburg whose politics are the antithesis of everything big-city residents value?

Get your act together, DN. Philly is fighting for its life.

Posted in Great Recession, livable cities, mainstream media, Philadelphia, Politics, taxes, unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fox News VP: Sure, I lied about Obama


In case you wondered why Roger Ailes and his motley crew are barred from Canadian TV outlets, here’s this from Media Matters:

In newly uncovered audio, a Fox News executive boasts that he lied repeatedly during the closing days of the 2008 presidential campaign when he speculated on-air “about whether Barack Obama really advocated socialism.” Speaking in 2009 on board a pricey Mediterranean cruise sponsored by a right-wing college, Fox Washington managing editor Bill Sammon described his attempts the previous year to link Obama to “socialism” as “mischievous speculation.” Sammon, who is also a Fox News vice president, acknowledged that “privately” he had believed that the socialism allegation was “rather far-fetched.”

This is an extraordinary admission, even for a cynical spin doctor who thought the speech he made to fellow troglodytes at sea would never be seen by us ungodly advocates of spreading the wealth. A network VP, no less! It’s a reminder that mainstream news, as passive and shifty as it is, could be worse — would be worse if the other networks stooped to Joseph Goebbels-level propaganda instead of the more subtle versions of misinformation they feed to us. Except, that is, when they’re selling us a new war, or pretending the economy is recovering, or…

But you get my drift – Fox is the worst.

Footnote: To get a better idea of what a skunk Sammon is, see Inside Job, which explains how deeply Lawrence Summers — ex-chief of Obama's National Economic Council — was involved in the corrupt practices that crashed the economy in 2008. Only a super-capitalist or a total dunderhead would have brought Summers into the White House in the wake of the Wall Street disaster. And only a guy like Sammon, a specialist in big lies, would accuse a Wall Street lackey like Obama of being a socialist.

Posted in mainstream media, Obama, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Joe Bageant walked it as he talked it


Joe Bageant, the self-described “redneck socialist” writer who died this week at age 64, enjoyed exploring the great divide between the working class and the limousine liberal establishment. Sometimes he seemed one of the few progressive-minded author/social critics who even acknowledged this divide.

Bageant didn’t have the high visibility of the mainstream pundits who opine from safe, upper-middle class perches about the state of the nation (David Brooks, you weasel!), but he clicked with readers who loved his bemused disdain for American culture and his talent for tempering scathing critiques with smart, ornery jokes and curmudgeonly concern for the poor and dispossessed.

The other day, while writing about the bankers who were rewarded huge sums for grand theft and incompetence, I thought of this from Bageant’s essay “America: Y Ur Peeps B So Dumb”:

Cultural stupidity might not be so bad, were it not self-reproducing and viral, and prone to place stupid people in charge. All of us have, at some point, looked at a boss and asked ourselves how such a numb-nuts could end up in charge of the joint.

In my own field, the book biz, the top hucksters in sales and marketing, car salesman with degrees, are put in charge of publishing the national literature. Similarly, ex-Pentagon generals segue from killing brown babies in Iraq into university presidents and CEOs. Conversely, business leaders such as Donald Rumsfeld who fancy themselves as battlefield commanders and imagine their employees as troops to be “deployed,” find themselves happily farting behind Pentagon desks. On the strength of having mistaken Sun Tzu’s The Art of War for a business text, they get selected by equally delusional national leaders to make actual war on behalf of the rest of us.

But the most widespread damage is done at more mundane operational levels of the American empire, by clones of the over promoted asshole in the corner office where you work. At least one study demonstrated that random selection for corporate promotions offset the effect significantly. Research again confirms what is common knowledge around every workplace water cooler in the country.

Bageant’s writings are medicine for cultural stupidity and a respite from the world of corner offices and over-promoted assholes. Read Deer Hunting With Jesus: Dispatches from America’s Class War if you haven’t already, and Rainbow Pie: A Redneck Memoir, and the many essays on Bageant’s website. It’s a real shame there won’t be any more of them.

Posted in arts, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Denial is just a sign of the times


Sign? What sign?

This is what happens in other democracies when bankers try to reward themselves for helping to ruin the world economy:

Britain has a rival when it comes to bashing bankers. After a furious row over pay packages at Amsterdam-based ING in which thousands of customers threatened to make mass withdrawals, the Netherlands is now vying for the title of Europe’s most bonus-hating country. A growing Dutch political storm could end with a blanket ban on bonuses to financiers who work for institutions bailed out by the taxpayer. ING customers mobilised on Twitter and other social networks to protest at bonuses paid to bosses at the bank, one of the biggest in the country. The threat of direct action raised the spectre of a partial run on ING, terrifying the Dutch establishment. Fred Polhout, union organiser at the bank, says: “People were outraged. We heard about the bloated sums being paid again in the City and in New York; but suddenly the issue exploded on our own front door.”

Why no outrage here? Why allow Wall Street bankers to keep the huge bonuses they were awarded for sparking the worst economic slump since the Great Depression? Why not consign the masters of the universe to Sing Sing or some other black hole for perpetrating the fraud at the heart of the securities industry? While we’re at it, why not penalize rather than reward GE and other corporations for shipping American jobs overseas?

As Chris Hedges recently noted, Americans are discouraged by the mainstream media from questioning the big lies, and are, for a variety of reasons, in deeper denial about them than Europeans:

We are taught by all systems of information to chant the mantra that the market knows best…. It does not matter that the middle class—the beating heart of any democracy—is disappearing and that the rights and wages of the working class have fallen into precipitous decline as labor regulations, protection of our manufacturing base and labor unions have been demolished. It does not matter that corporations have used the destruction of trade barriers as a mechanism for massive tax evasion, a technique that allows conglomerates such as General Electric to avoid paying any taxes.

These things will matter, of course, but apparently not until a lot more jobs are sent overseas, nest eggs dry up, modest inheritances are spent, pensions and health benefits disappear, utilities are turned off and homes repossessed. Meanwhile, most Americans continue to walk around with “kick me” signs on their backs. You and I can’t see these signs, but politicians and their corporate bosses can.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, globalization, Great Depression, Great Recession, mainstream media, Obama, Politics, taxes, unemployment, Wall Street, world-wide economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

First, Dems give away the store. Then they haggle.


This is what happens when you supposedly represent the interests of working people but are too timid, dishonest or stupid to fight for those interests:

Republicans are poised to reject a White House offer, TPM has learned, that would cut over $30 billion in current spending because of disagreements over whether the package should include cuts to mandatory spending programs. Democrats are pushing for such cuts, which include the big entitlement programs, though the specific cuts they’re proposing remain unclear. In an ironic twist, Republicans oppose those cuts and want to limit the negotiations to non-defense discretionary spending, a smaller subset of the federal budget.

I’m betting timidity and dishonesty are closely linked in this case. It’s been obvious since last summer that Barack Obama and leaders of the (at that time) heavily Democratic Congress were gearing up to give away the store in the hope of appeasing fiscal conservatives. You have to wonder, as firedoglake does, whether the D.C. Dems, especially Obama, were ever serious about jump-starting the sort of economic recovery that would benefit working people as opposed to corporations and big banks:

There’s no question that Republicans played the “Bad Cop, Insane Cop” game very expertly. But it was apparent from the moment that Democrats allowed the 2011 budget to be decided on the watch of the new Republican House that there would be a massive reduction like this. They failed to finish a 2011 budget resolution as part of the deal for extending the Bush tax cuts for two years. They failed to incorporate an increase in the debt limit into that as well. As a result, they forced themselves to negotiate with a bad hand. And they’re not the best negotiators in the first place.

The result is a series of immediate cuts when the recovery remains fragile. Furthermore all of those cuts will hit the relatively shallow non-discretionary non-security slice of the budget, magnifying the impact on Americans who receive services from that.

Or were the Dems merely outmaneuvered, which would put them in the “stupid” category? Two years ago, no one would have guessed that Mitch McConnell and John Boehner and the other uglies would turn out to be more clever than Barack Obama. Harry Reid, maybe, but not Obama.

The Dems, essentially declaring defeat, have conceded $30 billion in spending cuts even before the serious fighting has begun. Now the only question is how much more badly they will be defeated by the time the battle is over.

And don’t count on the Dems scoring a public relations victory if the uglies shut down the government. Given their track record, they’re more likely to find a way to end up looking like the bad guys.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, Great Depression, health care, mid-term elections, Obama, Politics, taxes, unemployment | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Corbett — ideologue or high-priced whore?


From Philly.com:

“The Marcellus industry has been clear and outspoken on this for a year or so,” said Ray Walker, vice president of Range Resources in Texas and chairman of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry group. “We are willing to discuss a severance tax.” But the new governor isn’t. In fact, Gov. Corbett, who signed a no-tax pledge during his campaign last year, is far more resolute in his opposition to a tax than many in the industry that would pay it…

One thing is not in dispute: A tax on Marcellus Shale gas could raise a lot of money. Drilling in the shale has ramped up dramatically since 2004, when Pennsylvania got its first well using the new hydraulic-fracturing process that frees gas from the rock. From July 2009 to December 2010, drillers reported, 1,247 Marcellus Shale wells produced 466 billion cubic feet of gas. At today’s prices, a 5 percent tax – akin to West Virginia’s – would have collected $93 million in that period.

Corbett says he’s opposed to a tax because it would spur drillers to move to a more business-friendly state. But Marcellus Shales says it was willing to discuss being taxed. So what’s the real reason he won’t tap into this revenue source but is, for instance, eager to break the public school system because, he says, there’s no money to fund it?

Maybe Corbett has read Ayn Rand’s trash and is a genuine free-market ideologue, opposed to taxing businesses on principle, regardless of the good it might do. Or he’s afraid his “no taxes” promise will come back to bite him if he’s opposed for renomination by some Republican who’s even more right-wing than he is, though that’s hard to imagine. Or he was bought by a taxes opponent more powerful than the drilling industry, which gave Corbett’s campaign $800K. Maybe there’s an extremely discreet sugar daddy Corbett simply can’t afford to offend.

I’m opposed to drilling in PA because all the money in the world isn’t worth having your water supply poisoned, and because any politician in today’s world not working to establish alternative energy sources — there would be plenty of PA jobs for wind and solar — is an enemy of the future.

But I’m also interested in psychopathology and know an interesting case when I see one. What’s this guy’s story?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New Deal soon for the jobless? More like no deal


Frances Fox Piven recently addressed the plight of the long-term unemployed and, perhaps more strongly than she intended, linked it to President Obama’s failure to act as a forceful advocate for jobs creation.

Piven cited Obama’s lukewarm efforts to persuade corporate executives to use some of the cash they’re hoarding for new hiring and concluded that “pressing [Obama] hard from his base” is the only tactic that might provoke him to take serious action on behalf of the unemployed.

But she stopped short of addressing the obvious need for an alternative to Obama. Real change always happens spontaneously, she argued, and it happens at the grassroots level, through some catalyst that’s hard to identify:

… Before people can mobilize for collective action, they have to develop a proud and angry identity and a set of claims that go with that identity. They have to go from being hurt and ashamed to being angry and indignant… Losing a job is bruising; even when many other people are out of work, most people are still working. So, a kind of psychological transformation has to take place; the out-of-work have to stop blaming themselves for their hard times and turn their anger on the bosses, the bureaucrats or the politicians who are in fact responsible…

There is no science that predicts eruption of protest movements. Who expected the angry street mobs in Athens or the protests by British students? Who indeed predicted the strike movement that began in the United States in 1934, or the civil rights demonstrations that spread across the South in the early 1960s? We should hope for another American social movement from the bottom—and then join it.

I don’t buy this sort of magical thinking. I’m all for taking grievances to the street, but attention will not be paid to the long-term unemployed or the working poor until progressives rally behind a viable Democratic or third-party candidate for president — someone who will, at the very least, scare or shame Obama into addressing the problems of the working class as a Democrat should.

The transformation Piven urged must start with the understanding that most D.C. Dems, under existing conditions, will do nothing to narrow the great divide that separates the wealthy from the barely-scraping-by.

People aren’t transformed spontaneously, or as soon as they stop blaming themselves — it only looks that way afterward. Transformation happens when people organize behind leaders who not only inspire them to believe their goals are achievable, as Obama did in 2008, but who also fight for those goals, as Obama failed to do once elected.

Posted in economic collapse, Great Recession, Obama, Politics, unemployment, world-wide economy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

For labor foes, Triangle fire never happened


Yesterday was the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire and a good time to acknowledge there are powerful people still determined to undo the progress made by organized labor in the aftermath of that disaster. Here’s Robert Reich on one such splendid fellow:

Maine Governor Paul LePage has ordered state workers to remove from the state labor department a 36-foot mural depicting the state’s labor history. Among other things the mural illustrates the 1937 shoe mill strike in Auburn and Lewiston. It also features the iconic “Rosie the Riveter,” who in real life worked at the Bath Iron Works. One panel shows my predecessor at the US Department of Labor, Frances Perkins, who was buried in Newcastle, Maine. The LePage administration is also renaming conference rooms that had carried the names of historic leaders of American labor, as well as former Secretary Perkins. The governor’s spokesman explains that the mural and the conference-room names were “not in keeping with the department’s pro-business goals.” Are we still in America?

That depends on whose America you’re asking about. Reactionary forces have been chipping away at workers’ rights at least since Reagan’s election and probably since George Wallace’s third-party candidacy in 1968 helped Richard Nixon slither into the White House. The seeds planted in those days have sprouted to full-grown trolls like LePage and other Republicans who campaigned last year as reformers. Voters drank the Kool-Aid and here we are in the Jonestown that Reich describes:

Governors across America are slashing corporate taxes as they slash state budgets. House and Senate Republicans are intent on deregulating, privatizing, and cutting spending and taxes so their corporate and Wall Street patrons will do even better.

LePage, who seemingly would like to wipe out the history of the labor movement, has more in common with Benito Mussolini than with Perkins. He and the other trolls want to push back the clock to as close to 1911 as the law will allow, and the law will be on their side unless the backlash against their efforts is fierce and determined.

One obstacle to a backlash is the Republicans’ ability to pit one wing of the working class against the other while claiming to be pro-jobs. They’ve gained ground because they know how to tweak people’s fears — OMG, what if there were no jobs at all! — and because the current crop of high-profile Dem politicians, from Obama on down, are more afraid of making enemies of the wealthy than of fulfilling promises they made to the people who elected them.

Reich again:

And it’s why we need a president who will fight for workers and fight against this assault – just as Perkins and FDR did.

I’m with you, Bob. Any suggestions?

Posted in economic collapse, globalization, Great Recession, mainstream media, Obama, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

N.J. polls show Christie’s act may wear thin


The Republican credo: austerity measures for all but the wealthy

Corbett in Pennsylvania, Christie in New Jersey, Walker in Wisconsin, Kasich in Ohio, Snider in Michigan, Daniels in Indiana and LePage in Maine are governors with the same objectives: break labor unions, privatize everything from school systems to liquor stores, boost the power of the millionaires and corporations.

In all of these states, most voters didn’t realize how ruthless these people are until after they’d voted them in. This month, N.J. voters are having second thoughts, and some of their legislators might be getting the message:

A resolution that would allow voters to decide whether to restore a higher tax rate on actual New Jersey millionaires has been introduced in the state Senate by Sen. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer). If voters approve the ballot question, the personal income tax rate on taxable income over $1 million would be increased from 8.97 percent to 10.75 percent, and the revenues from the levy would be dedicated to property tax relief. New Jersey has the highest property taxes in the nation. “An overwhelming majority of New Jersey residents indicated their support of resurrecting the millionaire’s tax, according to a recent Rutgers-Eagleton poll,” Turner said Tuesday. “Seventy-two percent of New Jerseyans approve of the idea; the level of support for this tax reflects a strong public opinion that the sacrifice during these tough economic times has not been shared by the wealthy.”

Turner’s idea probably has no legs. Even if it does, Christie’s blitzkrieg for the wealthy will continue on all fronts. He has refused to discuss millionaires’ income taxes and instead is planning a new gift for them — a massive estate tax cut. Similar cuts have been proposed by LePage and Kasich, and are part of the multi-state rightwing effort to shift the tax burden from the wealthy to the middle-class.

I suspect Christie is watching the polls and, if it seems the smart thing to do, will begin to tone down his Ralph Kramden act before the presidential primaries, maybe by losing a hundred pounds and lowering his voice a few dozen decibels. But his propaganda machine will keep cranking out the same lies, in the hope that constituents won’t catch on to the enormity of the con job he is perpetrating in the name of austerity.

Posted in Great Recession, NJ, Politics, taxes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MBS nuns wouldn’t have mourned Liz Taylor


The actress Elizabeth Taylor, who died today at age 79, was oft-mentioned in the Catholic grade school I attended. The nuns who taught at Most Blessed Sacrament in Southwest Philadelphia, lecturing on sin, used to tell us the “hussy” Liz embodied all that had gone wrong with the world since, I guess, the Inquisition ended. Or at least since the Age of Enlightenment began. She was beautiful and flaunted it. She converted to Judaism for her fourth husband, the singer Eddie Fisher, then left him for a married man, the actor Richard Burton. She was the original Eve, tempting us to banishment from the garden. Have a bite, kid, it’s delicious.

Naturally, I had to find out about this woman, which wasn’t hard to do. Stories and photos of her were in every mainstream publication. She was the Angelina Jolie of her time, but without the pomposity or the anorexia. I saw her in Cleopatra, a really bad movie, and was smitten. I knew then what I wanted when I grew up. (Maybe the nuns were right.)

Later on, I grew to appreciate Taylor’s talent and heart, especially playing against type as the blowsy, acid-tongued Martha, with Burton as George, in the screen adaptation of Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? The movie still packs a punch, as in this exchange that might amuse my friends in academia:

Martha [to the couple’s young guests]: You see, George didn’t have much push. He wasn’t particularly aggressive. In fact, he was sort of a flop. A great big fat flop!
George [roars and smashes liquor bottle on bookcase]: Stop it Martha.
Martha: I hope that was an empty bottle, George. You can’t afford to waste good liquor. Not on your salary. Not on an associate professor’s salary.

Almost forgot: Liz seemed to be one of the good guys in real life, devoting a lot of time to charities, including a foundation that raised about $325 million to fight AIDS. But yes, the nuns were right — she was beautiful.

Posted in arts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments