A glass-half-full take on OWS clearout


Tuesday was a career-defining day for Mike Bloomberg. First he ordered Zuccotti Park cleared by paramilitary cops who roughed up and/or arrested many protesters and a few reporters in the process. Then he ignored a court order to allow the protesters to return to the park, stalling until he found a judge who would make a ruling more to his liking:

Supreme Court Justice Michael Stallman on Tuesday denied a motion by the demonstrators seeking to be allowed back into the park with their tents and sleeping bags. Police cleared out the protesters in a nighttime sweep early Tuesday. The judge upheld the city’s effective eviction of the protesters after an emergency appeal by the National Lawyers Guild… After the ruling came down, protesters were allowed to reenter the park, albeit without any bulky items or large backpacks.

Many observers have assumed a glass-half-full attitude regarding Bloomberg’s attack on protesters and their First Amendment rights. Ezra Klein thinks the mayor did the movement a favor because the resolve of the the Zuccotti Park occupiers would have weakened significantly as weather worsened:

In aggressively clearing them from the park, Bloomberg spared them that fate. Zuccotti Park wasn’t emptied by weather, or the insufficient commitment of protesters. It was cleared by pepper spray and tear gas. It was cleared by police and authority. It was cleared by a billionaire mayor from Wall Street and a request by one of America’s largest commercial real estate developers. It was cleared, in other words, in a way that will temporarily reinvigorate the protesters and give Occupy Wall Street the best possible chance to become whatever it will become next.

I don’t know about that, but I’ll bet the police-state tactics Bloomberg used woke up a lot of liberals who’ve been sitting on the fence regarding the Occupy movement. If it didn’t, then this country is in even worse shape than it seems.

Posted in Great Recession, mainstream media, Occupy Wall Street, Politics, The New Depression, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obama’s silence on OWS speaks volumes


Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed, weighed in today on the OWS mess, lest we forget the abandonment of the poor and middle-class by Barack Obama, the anti-FDR:

“One of the appalling things here is that there are so many Democratic mayors involved in these crackdowns or in Bloomberg’s case, someone who is seen as a liberal,” Ehrenreich said in a telephone interview. “And where in all this was Obama? Why couldn’t he have picked up the phone at some point a couple of weeks ago and called the mayors of Portland and Oakland and said: ‘go easy on these people. They represent the anger and aspirations of the majority.’ Would that have been so difficult…?”

… For years, [Ehrenreich] said, she had maintained the importance of going out to vote. Now, she suggested she was becoming sympathetic to the argument of some of the protesters that the political system was so corrupted that elections were irrelevant.

“I am a responsible citizen. I always tend to drag myself out to vote but I am having trouble making arguments for that. I find myself having a lot of trouble,” she said. “We do not seem to be heard or represented.”

She added: “I just feel so disgusted at this point.”

For all her anger, though, Ehrenreich said she remained confident that the evictions were not the last for the movement.

Posted in economic collapse, Obama, Occupy Wall Street, Politics, The New Depression, unemployment, Wall Street | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Bloomberg’s doubletalk on park evictions


Here, from Raw Story, is all you have to know about the integrity of the billionaire mayor from Wall Street:

After ordering the eviction of protesters from Zuccotti Park, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday explained that the park would temporarily remain closed due to a court order that restrained the city from closing the park.

A ruling issued by [Manhattan Supreme Court Justice] Lucy Billings… said that the city is “prohibited from: “(a) Evicting protesters from Zuccotti Park and/or (b) Enforcing the “rules” published after the occupation began or otherwise preventing protesters from re-entering the park with tents and other property previously utilized,” the ruling said.

At a press conference Tuesday morning, Bloomberg said that protesters had only been “temporarily” asked to leave the park “to reduce the risk of confrontation and to minimize destruction in the surrounding neighborhood…”

… He went on to insist that “no right is absolute, and every right comes with responsibility,” suggesting that the First Amendment “does not allow tents and sleeping bags to take over public space.”

So Bloomberg has evicted protesters and is preventing them from returning, and he’s blaming his refusal to allow them to return on the judge who ruled the evictions illegal. This makes him not only a double-talker, but also something close to a dictator.

Posted in liar, Occupy Wall Street, Politics, The New Depression, Wall Street, weasel | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

It ain’t broke, but Mitt would fix VA health care


From ThinkProgress:

Mitt Romney floated the idea of partially privatizing the veterans health care system during a roundtable discussion with vets in South Carolina on Veterans Day, saying, “When you work in the private sector and you have a competitor, you know if I don’t treat this customer right, they’re going to leave me and go somewhere else, so I’d better treat them right…”

Reading the piece, I thought of what a disaster our private-sector health insurance system is — of how rarely customers are treated right, because all the “competitors” for our business cheat and overcharge. And of how the VA health care system is, by comparison, a model of efficiency. As the ThinkProgress writer noted:

… The fully integrated veterans’ health care structure of doctors and hospitals provides veterans with benefits that are the envy of the rest of the health care system. A study by the RAND Corporation found that “VA patients were more likely to receive recommended care” and “received consistently better care across the board, including screening, diagnosis, treatment and follow up. Rather than taking veterans out of a system that consistently delivers “higher quality of care,” Romney should expand its services and improve access.

And then I remembered who we’re dealing with here. Romney, the front-running Republican presidential candidate, became rich at the expense of people who worked for companies that were bought and sold by his private equity firm. He and his “deputies,” as the NYT called them, are directly responsible for the suffering of thousands of people who lost jobs or had their salaries and benefits cut.

Mitt thinks he did honorable work, that the companies he tore apart — the ones that survived — are healthier because they’re more efficient — i.e., more profitable for executives and shareholders. But some of us think Mitt is a pious marauder, a standout performer among those who have used downsizing, off-shoring, privatizing and other strategies to enrich themselves by drastically lower the quality of life for those of us who aren’t wealthy.

Posted in economic collapse, Great Recession, health care, Mitt Romney, Politics, The New Depression, weasel | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The weasel David Brooks satirizes inequality


Never let it be said that NYT columnist David Brooks, the Earnest Weasel, doesn’t have a sense of humor, even though his attempts at social satire are about as amusing as a buyout by Mitt Romney’s private equity firm. Here’s Brooks on Friday:

Foreign tourists are coming up to me on the streets and asking, “David, you have so many different kinds of inequality in your country. How can I tell which are socially acceptable and which are not?” This is an excellent question. I will provide you with a guide to the American inequality map to help you avoid embarrassment.

Haha. I’ll bet no one approaches Brooks on the street. He probably spends about 10 minutes a month on the street. And if someone did approach him, the question would be much simpler, something like, “David, how come the gap between rich and poor is bigger in America than in any other advanced country?” Or maybe, “Hey weasel, can you spare a dollar?”

The income gap in America is exactly the issue that Brooks dodges at all costs, in all of his lame newspaper columns. In this one, he weasels away from it by invoking concepts such as “ancestor inequality” and “fitness inequality,” presumably to trivialize the very concept of inequality — to argue in an oblique way that inequality is in the eye of the beholder; that it is not something as clear and quantifiable as income distribution.

He writes that income inequality is socially acceptable — poor people don’t mind that baseball players and CEOs make multimillions — but “spending inequality” isn’t:

If you make $1 billion, it helps to go to work in jeans and black T-shirts. It helps to live in Omaha and eat in diners. If you make $200,000 a year, it is acceptable to spend money on any room previously used by servants, like the kitchen, but it is vulgar to spend on any adult toy that might give superficial pleasure, like a Maserati.

In other words, “inequality” is an abstraction, a rigid-sounding but flexible term that has more to do with personal needs and expectations, with notions of political correctness and even fashion, than with the material well-being of the general population.

We have to infer this because Brooks, being a weasel, is incapable of making the argument directly. He’s the same affluent Republican mouthpiece who, over the years, has shouted “Class warfare!” in response to anyone who, for instance, suggested that huge tax breaks for the rich have contributed to the growing inequality between rich and poor.

Brooks’ conclusion: “Dear visitor, we are a democratic, egalitarian people who spend our days desperately trying to climb over each other. Have a nice stay.”

Nicely done, weasel, except that you very obviously forgot to add that the 99 percent of us who aren’t wealthy can’t climb out of the hole dug for all of us by the ultra-rich, not without a prolonged and very nasty fight.

Posted in David Brooks, economic collapse, Great Recession, humor, liar, mainstream media, Mitt Romney, New York Times, Occupy Wall Street, Politics, The New Depression, unemployment, weasel | 1 Comment

We love you, Joe Pa


Here we are again, wondering where to draw the line between fans and fanatics, admirers and cultists, loyalty and blind obedience to the great leader. The issue came up after hundreds of students rioted to protest the firing of long-time Penn State football Joe Paterno in connection with the arrest of alleged pederast Jerry Sandusky, Paterno’s former assistant coach. A sports fan reacted with a piece in Salon, from which this is taken:

A friend of mine once explained to me that [cult leaders] rely on people who are broken, in some way, for their support. That seems true, as [Charlie] Manson was surrounded by drifters seeking refuge from their lives and a place where they were accepted and loved. The same is true for cult leaders like [Jim] Jones, [David] Koresh, or Heaven’s Gate leader Marshall Applewhite, who also famously led a group to mass suicide while waiting for the arrival of the Hall-Bopp [sic] comet. While “broken” may be too strong a word, perhaps the words “impressionable” or “lost” are better. And students, especially impressionable teenagers away from home for the first time, can easily get drawn into a frenzy, protesting for a cause that they neither understand or have even tried to fully digest.

The writer wasn’t arguing that Joe Paterno was a cult leader, only that some people, especially young people, tend to react in a recklessly indignant way when people they look up to get in trouble.

In fact, Paterno was a cult leader, and much more. He lorded it over the young and old. Most of his followers weren’t broken, and not even impressionable, not in the way the writer meant the word. They were the sort of people who think of themselves as wholesome, God-fearing and freedom-loving. They filled a stadium that holds 100,000 on game days, wore and waved the blue-and-white, and came to believe the team, the town, and the emperor of Happy Valley were one and the same.

They are good people, most of them, for sure. They are also a horde of potential Nazis.

Posted in arts, mainstream media, Politics, pop music, sports | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Veterans Day Beefheart


I cry but I can’t buy
Your Veteran’s Day poppy
It don’t get me high
It can only make me cry
It can never grow another
Son like the one who warmed me my days
After rain and warmed my breast
My life’s blood

From Wikipedia:

The red remembrance poppy has become a familiar emblem of [Veterans] Day due to the poem “In Flanders Fields”. These poppies bloomed across some of the worst battlefields of Flanders in World War I, their brilliant red colour an appropriate symbol for the blood spilled in the war.

From Lester Bangs’ 1969 review of Trout Mask Replica, the album on which “Veterans Day Poppy” appeared:

… While many other groups have picked up on the trappings of the new jazz, [Captain Beefheart] and the Magic Band are into its essence, the white-hot stream of un-“cultured” energy, getting there with a minimum of strain to boot. This is the key to their whole instrumental approach, from the drummer’s whirling poly- and even a-rhythmic patterns (compare them to Sonny Murray’s on Ayler’s Spiritual Unity or Ed Blackwell’s on Don Cherry’s Symphony for Improvisers), to the explosive, diffuse guitar lines, which (like Lou Reed’s for the Velvet Underground or Gary Peacock’s bass playing on Spiritual Unity) stretch, tear, and distend the electric guitar’s usual vocabulary with the aim of extending that vocabulary past its present strictly patterned limitations…

Posted in arts, Politics, pop music | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Debunking Mitt’s most recent big lie


Here’s how the corporate media works: The well known double-talker Mitt Romney makes dubious statements meant to undermine another candidate. Reporters write stories that leave Mitt’s statements unchallenged. Readers are left with the impression that Mitt is stating facts.

It is often days before the dubious statements are challenged in the publication that ran them, usually in a “he said/she said” analysis piece or a blandly worded editorial that impresses no one.

Then, finally, the dubious statements — lies, that is — are totally refuted by a columnist. But it’s implicit that the columnist is only stating opinions, even when he or she is obviously debunking bald-faced lies.

Here’s Paul Krugman, The New York Times’ designated debunker, responding to lies by Mitt Romney that should have been corrected by reporters and editors:

…Mitt Romney has accused President Obama of taking his inspiration from European “socialist democrats” and asserted that “Europe isn’t working in Europe.” The idea, presumably, is that the crisis countries are in trouble because they’re groaning under the burden of high government spending. But the facts say otherwise.

It’s true that all European countries have more generous social benefits — including universal health care — and higher government spending than America does. But the nations now in crisis don’t have bigger welfare states than the nations doing well — if anything, the correlation runs the other way. Sweden, with its famously high benefits, is a star performer, one of the few countries whose G.D.P. is now higher than it was before the crisis. Meanwhile, before the crisis, “social expenditure” — spending on welfare-state programs — was lower, as a percentage of national income, in all of the nations now in trouble than in Germany, let alone Sweden.

It’s a hell of a way to run a news operation, isn’t it?

Posted in economic collapse, Great Recession, liar, mainstream media, Mitt Romney, New York Times, Politics, The New Depression, unemployment | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal judge to SEC: Do your job!


Maybe the SEC hasn’t done a better job of policing Wall Street and protecting investors from fraud because the SEC itself is a fraud:

A federal judge Wednesday challenged the SEC’s plan to settle a fraud case against Citigroup for $285 million, saying that the deal would recoup only a fraction of investors’ losses and would leave the firm free to proclaim its innocence in private lawsuits over the remaining damages.

The judge used the Citigroup case to mock the SEC’s traditional way of doing business — allowing defendants to settle without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

The unproven allegations, U.S. District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff said, “are no better than rumor or gossip.”

“Does not the SEC of all agencies have an interest in establishing what the truth is?” Rakoff asked.

It was the third case since the financial meltdown of 2008 in which Rakoff sharply questioned the value of enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is responsible for policing Wall Street and protecting investors.

Citigroup is accused of misleading investors about a 2007 transaction tied to the deteriorating housing market in which the firm bet against its customers and made profits of $160 million while the customers lost more than $700 million.

Matt Taibbi took a look at the numbers and came up with a fitting analogy:

Rakoff of course is right – the settlement is nuts. If you take Citi’s $160 million profit on the deal into consideration, what we’re talking about then is a $125 million fine for causing $700 million in damages. That, and no admission of wrongdoing.

Just imagine a mugger who steals $70 from some lady’s wallet being sentenced to walk free after paying back twelve bucks. Magritte himself could not devise a more surreal take on criminal justice.

Posted in economic collapse, Great Recession, Obama, The New Depression, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Thanks for the memory, Rick


I hope this tough-talking, carefully coiffed hombre keeps better track of his guns and ammo than he does of his talking points during debates:

Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry says he will eliminate three federal agencies if elected president, but he just isn’t sure what they are. At Wednesday night’s CNBC Republican presidential debate, the candidate managed to remember the first two agencies but repeatedly failed to name the third.

Posted in enviromentalism, humor, mainstream media, Politics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment