NYT says beware of ‘hipster’ Democrats

Posted on December 11, 2010 by oddmanout215

In 1960, the hipster John F. Kennedy represented for liberals something similar to what Mr. Obama embodied as a candidate… ” — Matt Bai in the Dec. 7 New York Times

Is Obama a secret fan of William S. Burroughs?

The mainstream news monster is half-blind and barely functional, as Matt Bai recently demonstrated with his piece about Democratic challengers to Obama’s renomination. Early on, you realize there are no challengers, not yet, and that the article is a “what if” piece based on Bai’s hunch that Obama’s abysmal performance thus far might inspire progressive Democrats to field a candidate.

Bai’s article isn’t labeled “analysis,” but that’s what it’s supposed to be. In journalese, analysis means that the reporter takes the facts of the news story and tells you what they mean in the context of the big picture. Thus, the angry reaction of Democratic legislators to Obama’s tax-cut compromise with Republicans “is bound to intensify a debate” over whether the president “should face a primary challenge in 2012.” But “bound to” means there is no challenge as of yet, no actual story.

Note the spin in Bai’s piece. He writes that a primary challenge would come from “self-described progressive critics” of Obama, as if all Democratic critics of Obama are not only progressives, but self-described progressives. His language is flip, inaccurate and obviously biased, but he gets to pretend it is none of those things. He’s merely writing an analysis, even though he’s analyzing a story that hasn’t happened and using judgmental terms to indicate his disapproval of progressives.

The Kennedy reference is not only biased, but strange. Bai states that today’s liberals (are liberals and progressives the same thing?) see in Obama the same qualities a previous generation saw in “the hipster Kennedy.” Does that mean Obama is a hipster or merely that his fans think he is? And what does Bai mean by hipster? The word could refer to Beat Generation artist/bad guys like William S. Burroughs, or it might be a contemporary usage and refer to mild-mannered, shabbily dressed young urbanites who hang out in coffeehouses and have no strong political leanings.

The hipster Kennedy?

Take a chill pill, Matt, and try saying what you mean. Your false neutrality merely makes you seem sneaky, and more than a little incoherent.

Posted in mainstream media, mid-term elections, New York Times, Obama, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama’s bottom line: No, we can’t

Posted on December 8, 2010 by oddmanout215

If life were a Frank Capra movie, Barack Obama would have looked across the table at Mitch McConnell and said, “OK, Turtle Face, I’ll take this issue to the people and lay out the facts. You’re trying to blackmail Democrats. You’re holding jobless people hostage for the sake of the super-rich.”

Unfortunately, real life is the depressing spectacle of Obama being bitch-slapped by Republicans in November and bowing to their wishes a few weeks later, after they finally agreed to meet with him. It’s the non-spectacle of him slinking away in the name of compromise at exactly the times he should be asserting himself.

Real life is Obama appearing at a press conference and scolding the people who elected him instead of at community meetings, in front of voters, excoriating Republicans for pretending to care about the deficit while seeking an extension of Bush’s bonus tax cuts. It’s Obama sounding just like a Republican, promising that extended tax cuts will create three million jobs, even though some of these cuts have been in place for almost a decade — a decade in which Americans have been losing jobs at unprecedented rates.

Real life is Obama’s minions saying that tax deal was good “under the circumstances,” without adding that the president created the circumstances by not fighting the extensions months ago. By not going directly to the people with his arguments, as Harry Truman or any principled Democrat would have done.

Real life is Obama proving beyond a doubt that the Democratic establishment, which includes him and most Congressional Democrats, doesn’t represent the interests of the people any more than Republicans do. It’s confirmation that his “Yes we can” slogan really meant “No we can’t” as in no, we can’t stop big business and Wall Street from robbing us.

The only question now is whether the enigmatic Obama is merely an eloquent fool or a super-sly front man for the robbers. His continued reliance on the opinions and judgments of corrupt Wall Streeters such as Lawrence Summers feeds suspicion that the latter is true.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, Great Depression, mainstream media, Obama, Politics, taxes, unemployment, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ugly old white men still rule!

Posted on December 5, 2010 by oddmanout215

It is hard to believe, as the holidays approach yet again amid economic hard times, but Congress looks as if it may let federal unemployment benefits lapse for the fourth time this year. — Nov. 28 New York Times editorial

Mitch McConnell (Yes, Virginia, there is a grinch.)

No, it is not hard to believe, not unless you’re naive enough to think the ugly old white men who run the Republican Party would consider placing the needs of millions of poor people ahead of the wishes of the billionaires who are their benefactors and bosses. Not unless you don’t understand that Republicans will block any economic stimulus plans that aren’t tied to continued bonus tax cuts for the wealthy.

Here’s what didn’t happen this week: legislation to help the two million people who might soon join the four million who’ve exhausted unemployment claims and the God-knows-how-many millions who’ve been jobless for so long that bean counters simply ignore them. The newbies would be jobless in a country where the official jobless rate  is now at 9.8 percent. (The unofficial rate is twice as high.)

Here’s what else didn’t happen: an agreement to end “temporary” bonus tax cuts for the wealthy that were pushed through early in the George W. Bush administration. Republicans blocked an end to the cuts even though extending them will add more than $80 billion to the national debt in two years, will not stimulate economic growth, and will defy the majority of Americans who want bonus tax cuts for the wealthy to end.

The vote was yet another defeat for the Dems who, despite significant majorities in the House and Senate, have for two years done almost nothing to create jobs for those put out of action by the ongoing economic meltdown that started in 2008.

The upshot is no tax-cut extensions for the less than super-wealthy (couples who make $250,000 or less), and no benefits extensions or jobs programs for the unemployed — not without extended tax cuts for the wealthy. The non-wealthy are essentially being held hostage by the uglies, who answer to the billionaires.

But I don’t blame the uglies — they are merely doing what ugly people do. The people who deserve blame and ought to be ashamed are President Obama and the Democrats in Congress who didn’t push legislation to combat unemployment and end bonus tax cuts when such efforts might have succeeded. At the latest, this should have happened a few weeks before the midterm elections, in order to signal voters that there was still a difference between the parties. Now many of the Dems are lame ducks and have only a few days left to make a difference.

A clarification on ugliness: Yes, there are probably equal numbers of unfortunate looking male Democrats and Republicans in Congress. However, unfortunate looking isn’t the same as ugly, which entails an ungenerous mindset and meagerness of spirit. Using these criteria, I challenge anyone to debunk my claim that Republicans are uglier than Democrats. Ladies and gents, take the human tortoise Mitch McConnell — please. You can also have John McCain, Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn, Jim Bunning, Roy Blunt, James Inhofe, Richard Shelby and Joe Lieberman (the latter used to be a Democrat but is so ugly, he had to become an independent.) Look up the voting records of these guys, they’re even uglier than you think.

Quotation of the week: “Beauty is only skin-deep, but ugliness cuts straight to the bone.” — anonymous Southwest Philadelphia sage

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, mainstream media, mid-term elections, New York Times, Obama, Politics, taxes, unemployment, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Tow-truck vultures vie for feeding rights in Philly

Posted on November 20, 2010 by oddmanout215

I’m wondering who else got a laugh watching the convoy of shiny tow trucks that circled City Hall like mechanized vultures a few days ago. The drivers were protesting a proposed city law that would place all local towing companies under the supervision of the Philadelphia Parking Authority. Some of the drivers stood on streetcorners handing out fliers explaining the injustice of the city’s power grab.

Give me a break. There aren’t many forms of urban life lower than the PPA bosses, but owners of tow truck companies is one of them. This subspecies is permitted to steal your car if it is parked in an “illegal” space and hold it until you come up with the $150-plus ransom fee.

The new law would force tow drivers to acquire special licenses and bring towed vehicles to PPA lots, and would keep rival companies from fighting over towing rights at car-wreck scenes.

One tow driver complained that the law would eliminate jobs. Pretty funny. Over the decades, Philly has lost countless thousands of manufacturing jobs to corporate outsourcing and thousands of desk jobs to suburbs that have more business-friendly tax laws. Philly over-relies on taxes and parking tickets to pay its bills because no one in city government has been smart enough to make the sort of changes that would attract new businesses and generate jobs.

The city feeds on itself, ultimately, and would be dead if not for tourism and the universities and hospitals. What would it matter if we lost a few vultures? They probably don’t even live here.

One useful nugget from the tow driver story in Philadelphia Daily News: It turns out George Smith, owner of the most notorious of the towing companies, is actually a shifty old bird named Anthony D’Angelo who is downright indignant because hundreds of towing companies are being penalized thanks to a few “bad apples.”

Yes, George, or Anthony, it’s a tough town we live in. It’s getting so even the vultures can’t feed in peace.

Posted in City Hall, livable cities, Philadelphia, Politics, taxes, unemployment | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alfred E. Neuman on cable news: ‘Yes, me worry!’

Posted on November 18, 2010 by oddmanout215

We live now in a cable news universe that celebrates the opinions of [Keith] Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly – individuals who hold up the twin pillars of political partisanship and who are encouraged to do so by their parent organizations because their brand of analysis and commentary is highly profitable.

— Ted Koppel, The Washington Post, Nov. 14

Reading Koppel’s piece, I remembered his old TV news show Nightline — his measured tones and smug Alfred E. Neuman-esque visage. He was so sure of everything.

Now he wants America to be sure about the decline and fall of TV journalism. To be nostalgic for the era of unbiased news, which never really existed, as Charles Kaiser persuasively argued this week. Walter Cronkite took to the airwaves to state the obvious about the Vietnam War in 1968, but you can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times mainstream journalists have shown such courage in the face of opposition from their “parent organizations.”

It’s easy to condemn others for bias when you’ve made a career of walking the thin line between impartial reporting and self-serving avoidance of news stories that cast an unflattering light on your network bosses and friends in government. (On Nightline, Koppel turned to the likes of Henry Kissinger for news analysis.) However, it’s inexcusable to pretend Olbermann and the other commentators on MSNBC are on the same gutter level with the frauds on Fox.

I can only take Olbermann in small doses, he can be a windbag and narcissist, but I’ve never heard him make any on-air assertions that weren’t backed by fact. Fox rarely traffics in facts. Its modus operandi is to take slanderous online items (from Andrew Breitbart and his ilk) and present them as news. I like this from an online piece by Rachel Maddow: “Pretending that MSNBC’s analysts and evening hosts do not have a liberal bias is not my point, they clearly do. However, Fox has proven in the past 18 months that it is not an actual news organization, but rather the media arm of the Republican Party.”

And yet no one in the so-called unbiased news racket, from Koppel on down, seems willing to acknowledge Maddow’s point. To do so would be to concede that unbiased news is a badly flawed concept that doesn’t serve the public any better than news that doesn’t pretend to be neutral. Koppel would rather push a false equivalence between MSNBC and Fox than admit mainstream news outlets are too complacent or scared to take on the powers that be, even when the stakes are as high as war in Iraq.

Footnote: Thomas Friedman recently dissed rightwing frauds for spreading the absurd rumor that Barack Obama’s recent trip to Asia was costing taxpayers $200 million a day. A little late, Tom, but good job. Too bad your colleagues in the news department seem determined to avoid any reporting on the link between media liars and the Republican Party.

Posted in Iraq war, mainstream media, New York Times, Obama, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sympathy for Aunt Gert

Posted on November 13, 2010 by oddmanout215

Keith endures one of Mick's Aunt Gert moments.

Mick Jagger… prances inexhaustibly through a two-hour set, at his best evoking the spawn of James Brown and Gumby, at his worst coming off like someone’s liquored-up Aunt Gert, determined to trash her prettier sister’s wedding with a gruesome performance on the dance floor. — from James Remnick’s Nov. 1 New Yorker review of Keith Richards’s autobiography, Life

I won’t try to top Remnick’s description of Jagger onstage or challenge his mostly favorable assessment of the book Richards wrote with help from James Fox, especially since I can’t afford the $30 hardcover and probably won’t read it until it turns up at the library. But I will say that Remnick’s is the best-written review of Life I’ve seen — the worst is by Liz Phair, in today’s New York Times — and as much a profile as it is a book review.

Remnick notes that Life is an addict’s narrative, like the opium-eating Thomas de Quincey’s, but in the subcategory of musician-addict memoir, like Miles Davis’s autobiography. He mentions biographies of Billie Holiday and Charlie Parker and notes there is “something almost creepy” about Richards’s having dodged most of the legal, financial and health problems that brought low so many down other famous junkie musicians. Forget “almost” — the 66-year-old ex-heroin addict’s uncanny good fortune definitely is creepy. But it’s also funny. As Remnick notes, “Maybe you can’t get what you want. The rule doesn’t apply to Keith.”

I’ll probably skim over Keith the junkie — his boastful recounting of drug binges with John Lennon and so on — and zero in on Keith the guitar player and key component of the greatest rock ‘n’ roll band that hasn’t recorded a memorable song in decades. And on the parts where he acknowledges his artistic debt to Chuck Berry, Muddy Waters and the other greats whose lives weren’t as charmed as his.

I’m lying. I love addiction stories, especially when the drugs are top-shelf. I’m already wondering if Keith’s “pure Merck cocaine, the fluffy pharmaceutical blow” was as potent as good meth. I’m sure it was much more expensive.

One concern: I hope Richards the writer wasn’t as tough on Jagger as Remnick was in his review. It’s true that the Rolling Stones’ famous front man turned into an uptown fashionista and first-class poof, but the great lyrics and vocals are his and always will be. In the end, it’s about the recordings. The rest is gossip.

Posted in autobiography, mainstream media, pop music | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wingnuts to Daddy Limbaugh: Lie to us

Posted on November 11, 2010 by oddmanout215

C.E.O.’s of the largest American companies earned an average of 42 times as much as the average worker in 1980, but 531 times as much in 2001… Perhaps the most astounding statistic is this: From 1980 to 2005, more than four-fifths of the total increase in American incomes went to the richest 1 percent.

— Nicholas Kristof, Nov. 6 New York Times

Conservative bloggers and talk-radio hosts (Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and so on) and tea party darling Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) claim that [President Obama’s trip to India] is costing taxpayers a staggering $200 million a day… It’s sad that someone even has to debunk these ridiculous claims. Any reasonable person who heard the $200 million a day number should realize that it’s off by at least an order of magnitude.

— Gulliver, Nov. 6 in The Economist
‘
Indulge me for a minute. Picture America as a big family rather than a pack of beaten-down dogs. The father is a benevolent dictator who pays the kids well to do their fair share of the chores. But then the old man dies and the mother — she’s turned into a timid, apple pie-baking nonentity — marries an ogre who doubles the kids’ chores and slashes their pay to chump change. They get skinnier every month. “I have no choice,” the ogre says. “Your mother spoiled you and you’re wasteful.”

The kids are angry and demand fair treatment, but reality kicks in and they realize the ogre owns everything. It’s his way or the highway, so they blame their ineffectual Mom and each other for their situation and work longer and harder for less and less. Meanwhile, the ogre sits on his fat ass and stashes away their earning in his private account.

That’s America today. Many people don’t want to think about what their corporate step-dad is doing to them, which is why the facts rattled off by Kristof — four-fifths of the total increase in incomes went to the richest 1 percent — were unknown or ignored by most voters on Election Day. The need to not think is why so many Americans apparently like Limbaugh, Beck and other media frauds. Better to get mad at Mama Obama than admit their resources have been stolen by their step-dad and are unrecoverable under the current political system.

Eventually, their modest savings will run out and they will have to look the ogre in the eye and say, “We want back what you stole.” Even then, I’ll bet they (we) find someone else to blame.

Posted in economic collapse, Great Depression, mainstream media, mid-term elections, New York Times, Obama, Philadelphia, Politics, unemployment, world-wide economy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kristof to Obama: Do you sweat?

Posted on November 5, 2010 by oddmanout215

“Mr. Obama has a far better product to sell than Tea Partiers like Mr. [Jim] DeMint. But Mr. Obama needs to connect better with American voters. He needs to lose the cool and start sweating — and slugging.” — Nicholas Kristof in the Nov. 4 New York Times.

Mr. Kristof’s advice to Mr. Obama reminds me of something Mr. Odd Man Out wrote back on July 22: “[Obama’s] failure to respond in a passionate and coherent way to Republican lies regarding the stimulus package, health care reform, the Gulf oil spill, jobless benefits and other issues large and small has cost us dearly. We all lose every time he fails to fight back.” This was under the heading: “Be an aggressor, or a counterpuncher. Anything but a stiff.”

Kristof seems an innately civil chap, eminently reasonable, not unlike Obama seems. Maybe that’s why it took him until after the midterms to understand that many Americans have come to perceive Obama as not reasonable but rather — putting it as politely as possible — overly cautious.

Obama’s meek approach to dealing with his sworn enemies is hard to fathom, given the fact that he’s well educated and surely knows that American politics has always been not only undignified but downright savage. He should remember that the best presidents, Lincoln and FDR, were attacked the most fiercely, by much more formidable foes than Mitch McConnell, John Boehner and Jim DeMint.

Better late than never, though it’s still inexcusable that Kristof and other well-intentioned liberals didn’t exhort Obama to fight earlier this year, when he hid out rather than push back against rightwing liars.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, Great Depression, Gulf, mainstream media, mid-term elections, New York Times, Obama, Philadelphia, Politics, unemployment, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

She voted to burn down her house

Posted on November 4, 2010 by oddmanout215

“‘I voted Republican, which is unusual for me,’ said one woman… ‘My main concern is the economy. I couldn’t stand by and watch it continue to crumble.'” — from the Nov. 3 Philadelphia Metro.

You have to love the logic. The woman may as well have said, “I voted for arson, which is unusual for me. My main concern is my home. I couldn’t stand by and let it continue to crumble, so I set it on fire.”

How ironic that our ever-improving communications systems don’t make us any better informed than people in past eras, even about issues that directly affect our livelihoods. If they had bothered to look, the newbie Republican woman and tens of thousands of other confused PA voters could have accessed a ton of information that explains why voting Republican, if you’re poor and middle-class, is like voting to burn down your house.

They would have learned that Senator-to-be Pat Toomey has a well-documented history of support for the corporate elite and contempt for working people. He’s an ex-president of the Club for Growth, which sounds like a support group for balding men in denial but is actually a powerful right-wing lobbying organization that opposes all taxation and regulation of corporations. With Club for Growth, he fought for abolition of the minimum wage and was a direct advocate for outsourcing jobs.

In his campaign, Toomey did a good job of avoiding discussion of the role he has played in undermining the economy as it affects millions of working people. So good that I’ll bet the woman quoted in the Metro was unaware that she’d voted for a man who, over the next six years, will work hard to boost corporate profits while lowering her standard of living.

Most likely, the woman was too busy to do research; too disappointed by Barack Obama’s poor leadership skills and cozy relationship with Wall Street; and/or too scared by the current unemployment rate to do anything other than cast a knee-jerk vote for candidates offering false remedies for a sick economy.

She’s the sort of person the Democratic Party will have to begin connecting with in order to make a respectable showing in the 2012 elections. She is, or was, the base.

Unfortunately, Dem politicians still don’t seem to understand how important it is to pursue an agenda that is unmistakably opposed to the sort of corporate ruthlessness that hurts working people. Obama is still saying he “made progress” during his first to years instead of admitting he squandered a great opportunity to reverse destructive Republican policies. He has promised to continue reaching across the aisle, to use an insipid cliche, while Republicans remain dead set on cutting off both of his arms.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, globalization, Great Depression, mainstream media, mid-term elections, Obama, Philadelphia, Politics, unemployment, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Where’s the sanity, dude?

Posted on November 2, 2010 by oddmanout215

Memo to Stewart: There’s no point to rallying about nothing.

Jon Stewart should stick to mild satire. His interviews can be politely irreverent, and he does an amusing job of using news clips to show that the media is, by and large, lazy and hypocritical in its coverage of national politics. (As if we didn’t already know that.)

But now Stewart is becoming grandiose, and that’s the same as boring. His weekend Rally to Restore Sanity was nothing but an opportunity for his fans — the ones who apparently don’t have anything better to do — to graze like lily-white sheep in Washington, D.C., pretending to be hip, while Stewart basked in their adulation and avoided voicing his opinions on issues that are changing our lives. Instead, he railed against the big, bad media.

Watching video of the event, I asked myself the same questions I’d asked while following Stewart’s promotion of his “non-partisan” rally last month: If you’re not taking a political stand, aren’t you merely standing around?

Alex Pareene of Salon thinks Stewart’s rally was implicitly Democratic: “An endorsement of civility and reason is basically an endorsement of Barack Obama,” Pareene wrote. “‘Reason and civility’ are practically the Democratic party’s platform. The rally was a call to keep fighting for the things that make educated young liberals support Democrats in the first place.”

I say “Bullshit.” I’ll bet most of the reasonable, allegedly educated liberals at Stewart’s rally won’t even vote today. They’re too busy pretending to be too reasonable to participate in partisan politics. The right-wing kooks who overwhelmingly represent the Republican Party in the mid-terms are happy that these liberals are so reasonable. Their reasonableness will make it all the more likely that the kooks will take control of Congress and, in the next two years, do their best to make the federal government even more dysfunctional.

I have seen and heard enough of this year’s Republicans to know they’re my enemies, and enemies of everyone else who isn’t wealthy. Most of the Democratic candidates aren’t good for much, but they’re saints compared to the GOP, which exists to serve the wealthy at the expense of the rest of us.

Sometimes you have to temper reason with anger. I voted today because my contempt for Republicans — the people who talk about creating jobs while helping corporations outsource American jobs — trumps my contempt for cowardly Democrats. My vote was cast in anger, but it was also the reasonable — and sane — thing to do.

Posted in Congress, economic collapse, globalization, health care, Obama, Philadelphia, Politics, unemployment | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments