American exceptionalism, in a nutshell

Bad guys are everywhere, friend-o.

Bad guys are everywhere, friend-o.

Spokespersons for the U.S. military often refer to anti-American combatants as “bad guys,” as if opposition to U.S. foreign policy is the same as immorality. As if killing on behalf of the U.S. government makes you exempt from bad-guy status.

Newsflash: Bad guys are everywhere. Chechen bad guys have killed Russian noncombatants in efforts to win independence for Chechnya. Russian bad guys have killed Chechen noncombatants in efforts to keep the region under Russian control. American bad guys are killing noncombatants throughout the Middle East to protect the interests of Big Oil.

One might argue that American bad guys are exceptionally bad because they insist on portraying themselves as good, no matter how many noncombatants they kill. These are the same Americans who insist that slaughtering Indians, nuking Japan and dropping napalm on the Vietnamese were all for the good.

It’s a big old goofy world, as John Prine sang, and there is nothing goofier than the notion that one nation is morally superior to another. That’s the message of every preacher or politician who denounces terrorist attacks on America while condoning American terrorism abroad; of everyone from the obviously bad Dick Cheney to the not-so-obviously bad Barack Obama, who speaks out against bombers in Boston even as he green-lights drone bombings that kill noncombatants on the other side of the world.

Footnote: Has anyone else had their fill of so-called news stories about the Boston Marathon bombings? Of ghouls with cameras who stalk those who knew the victims? (Reporter to relative of bombing victim: How does it feel to be the relative of a bombing victim?) Nothing is revealed in these creepy encounters, other than the fact that some people think journalism and voyeurism are the same thing.

This entry was posted in Iraq war, life in the big city, mainstream media, Obama, terrorism and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to American exceptionalism, in a nutshell

  1. The bigger the injustice committed, the bigger the lies needed to justify them.
    I know this is a bit of a risky remark in light of the Boston bombings and I don’t mean to disrespect the victims, but as long as the US continues to support radical regimes elsewhere, as long as they keep interfering in the political processes in other countries and as long as they keep killing people without trial abroad you will have to expect ‘nutcases’ to take their struggle to America. It’s just common sense, violence begets violence.


  2. robinhood63 says:

    (Insert countries name here) exceptionalism. Another way to try and justify atrocities against another country, religion or way of life that doesn’t agree with theirs.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.